DILEMA PENUNJUKAN ARBITER TUNGGAL (2) / DILEMMA OF
APPOINTING A SINGLE ARBITRATOR (2)
Oleh/By
Dr. A. Junaedy Ganie, SE, SH, MH, FCBArb, MCIArb,
FIIArb.
In my writing on 22
Feb. 2022, I talk about the need to anticipate possible risk of an impasse that
may arise from a disagreement over appointment of a sole arbitrator when the
arbitration clause under the agreement submits any dispute resolution through a
sole arbitrator at the time of dispute. One option is for the parties to add a
provision to automatically amend the settlement through an arbitration tribunal
when they cannot reach an agreement over a sole arbitrator.
This can be done prior
to signing the agreement or supplemented during the agreement. Both are
expected to be relatively easy to achieve because both parties are in good
term. However, how to deal with or anticipate it when the parties who are bound
by an agreement subject to settlement through a single arbitrator are already
in a dispute?
Diantara pilihan untuk menghindari
kebuntuan, terutama bagi calon Pemohon sebelum mengajukan permohonan arbitrase
adalah untuk mempertimbangkan apakah akan mengajukan Permohonan Arbitrase atas
dasar penunjukan arbiter tunggal sesuai ketentuan yang berjalan atau terlebih
dahulu mengajak calon Termohon untuk mengubah ketentuan penunjukan arbiter
dalam klausul penyelesaian sengketa pada perjanjian yang ada.
Among other options to
avoid an impasse, especially to the prospective Claimant before making an arbitration
submission, is to consider whether to submit to nomination of a single
arbitrator as governed by the existing dispute resolution clause or to first
invite the prospective Respondent to amend the terms of the existing clause.
Jakarta, 2 Maret 2022 / Jakarta, 2 March 2022.
Contact
IG : @junganie
Blog : http://junaedy-ganie.blogspot.com
LinkedIn : Dr. Junaedy Ganie, SE, SH, MH, FCBArb, MCIArb, FIIArb
No comments:
Post a Comment