Journey to my first professional qualification
Dr. Junaedy
Ganie
I am very
colourful in term of the number of professional qualifications under my belt. However,
I have an interesting story to share on how I gained my first qualification.
In general
insurance, I am a Fellow of the Australian & New Zealand Institute of
Insurance & Finance, a Certified Insurance Professional from the same
Institute, a Fellow of the Indonesian Insurance Institute (AAMAI) on honoris
cause basis.
In the life insurance
and financial sector, I am a Chartered Life Underwriter and Chartered Financial
Consultant.
Being an
Arbitrator, I could not resist pursuing professional qualifications in
arbitration to match and support my vast practical experiences. Toward end of
2016, I earned my Fellow BANI Chartered Arbitrator recognition and then passed
the exam from London based Chartered Institute of Arbitrators to earn my Member
of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators qualification.
However, how did
I earn my first professional qualification? It was with the New Zealand
Institute of Insurance (NZII), well before it merged with the Australian
Institute of Insurance to become what it is today, The Australian & New
Zealand Institute of Insurance & Finance.
I took the
distance learning and tutorial from NZII. The Institute provided once a year
examination held in Jakarta under the supervision of the local examination
centre organized in cooperation with the executives of Asuransi Inda Tamporok,
a New Zealand Insurance Joint Venture in Indonesia. I recall that Arizal was
the first AIINZ designation holder followed by Ketut Swastika, both were respectively
the General Manager and marine manager there, Arizal later became the Managing Director of the
company. They took a few expatriates working in the insurance
business in Indonesia with ACII qualification the like of Bernard Sheriff,
Edward Nugent and a few Indonesians who were either earlier holders of ACII designation
or still taking the courses in UK to supervise the examinations. All exams was on essay basis and result of completed papers/home works counted 30% toward the pass mark.
I sat for the
exam for first time in 1987 when I was working for IBS. I took 3 subjects and passed
all subjects. In the following year, I took 4 subjects and likewise I passed
all. In third year, in 1989, with 5 out of 12 subject left to obtain my AIINZ
professional qualification, I took all 5 and determined to complete all the
subjects and set a record to earn the qualification in 3 years.
The first
examination days went well and I thought I performed well. It turned out that the night before the last day
was the night of the arrival of our second child and first baby boy which was rather
prematurely at Pondok Indah hospital. Nevertheless, I was all set for the exam
and just stayed on at the hospital, with a few hours before the exam, admiring
and looking after our baby boy. At about 1.00 pm, an hour prior the exam to take
place, I arrived at Tugu Pratama’s hall fully prepared for the test only to
find that the room was empty. Deserted. Nobody was there. It was not the age of
mobile phone so I rushed to ask of what happened and learnt that the exam was
held in the morning! I was very disappointed and could not accept it even
though it was nobody’s mistake but mine. I immediately went to the office of
Inda Tamporok and met with Kevin Horrack, a New Zealander who worked there and
asked him to make call to New Zealand to ask for exemption to sit for the exam
under his supervision. Unfortunately, the response was negative and he told me,
“I know who you are but regrettably they
told me they would not make precedence and you would have to take another one
next year”. I, being a hard headed and of a persistent personality, insisted
to him to give me the exam paper and be allowed to sit for the exam and let the
people in Wellington to decide whether or not my paper would be accepted. He
concurred with me.
Unfortunately, when
the assessment was returned some weeks or a few months later, I passed all
except the one I took in the last day. I had got 11 out of 12 subjects
completed. It would be understandable if I did not perform well given the
situation immediately prior to the exam. I would have to understand if the
Institute did not want to allow me to set a precedence of taking it beyond the
set time table. Somehow, I could not accept it and decided not take another
exam the following year and the following year and the following year for 3 years
in a row. Then, I had to face reality when, like or not, under the new
insurance regulation following the enactment of Law No. 2 Year 1992, the government started to made insurance
professional qualification to be mandatory requirement to hold certain technical
positions. I came to point that I had no choice but to take the exam and with
only one subject to pass, NZII exam was the fastest route to meet the local
requirement. I managed to make peace
with myself and sat for the exam and passed and finally earned my Associate of the
Insurance Institute of New Zealand (AIINZ) designation. I can recall that Ketut
Swastika called me to congratulate me for completing the study and said, “It is great that we now have you among our members”. It turned out that during the period of my disappearance,
NZII still had not produced any new graduate after Arizal and Ketut and I happened
to be its third graduate in Indonesia.
Given my standing
in the local market and the benefits it gave me, I felt that it was as good
as it was to me as it was to NZII to have me as one of its members to attract
other Indonesians to study from NZII. The uncertainty whether the government of
Indonesia would recognise the overseas qualification to be in compliance with the
legal requirement was clear with NZII qualification was
recognised and since then more and more students took NZII exams in Indonesia. This
qualification was later converted into Senior Associate of Australian and New
Zealand Institute of Insurance and Finance designation following the merger of
New Zealand Insurance Institute with the Australian Insurance Institute. In
total, it took me 7 years to complete including the 3-year absence without leave
notice while I could have taken only 3 plus 1 year should I be more thoughtful
and be wiser. A lesson learnt.
If we compare with the current practice following the implementation of Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL), it was indeed a different world.
Jakarta, 5 February 2017
Dr. Junaedy Ganie
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete